If you have spent any time in elite sport, you will have met the athlete whose decline does not fit a neat narrative. Training looks appropriate on paper, their fuelling is “good enough”, and yet something unravels: performance stagnates, sleep becomes fragmented, mood darkens, minor infections become frequent, and the body starts to feel older than it should. In those moments, the language of sport tends to become diagnostic and disciplinary: overtraining, burnout, relative

Most people in sport agree on the basics: athletes improve by training, and “training load” matters. Increase load (sensibly) and you adapt. Increase it too fast, too far, or for too long, and fatigue rises, illness risk creeps in, and performance stalls or drops. Entire monitoring systems, dashboards, and coaching conversations are built around that logic. But there’s a problem hiding in plain sight: we often talk about “load” as if it means training and only training. In re

The recently published UCI Sports Nutrition Project paper on road cycling provides one of the most comprehensive overviews to date of race nutrition in professional road cycling (1)(CLICK HERE). It was a privilege to bring together a group of scientists and practitioners working directly with WorldTour teams, to write a scientific paper and describe evolution or revolution of nutrition in this sport that is leading the way in applied sports nutrition. This paper aimed not to